<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Started with Aperture &#8211; Organizing &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1</link>
	<description>A dozen dozen?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:53:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-693</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;d recommend keeping your folder structure for your initial import. It won&#039;t slow down your import and will (possibly!) add valuable info to the pictures. Every folder will be imported as an Aperture Album which may help in tagging. 

Once the images are in Aperture you can use Aperture&#039;s file management tools to reorganize them by date, Project, or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;d recommend keeping your folder structure for your initial import. It won&#8217;t slow down your import and will (possibly!) add valuable info to the pictures. Every folder will be imported as an Aperture Album which may help in tagging. </p>
<p>Once the images are in Aperture you can use Aperture&#8217;s file management tools to reorganize them by date, Project, or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin weaver</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>I have thousands of photos arranged, or not, in many folders and subfolders. The folder titles are sometimes useful, sometimes not. I am considering starting anew with aperture and just dumping all files into one folder, as the subfolders seem to be a barrier to a quick import. I don&#039;t want this to take more than 4 hours. Any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have thousands of photos arranged, or not, in many folders and subfolders. The folder titles are sometimes useful, sometimes not. I am considering starting anew with aperture and just dumping all files into one folder, as the subfolders seem to be a barrier to a quick import. I don&#8217;t want this to take more than 4 hours. Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-622</guid>
		<description>If you choose to save your Aperture photos in the Aperture Library then they are kept safe for you inside of a special kind of folder that looks in the Finder like a single file. That keeps you from accidentally causing problems for Aperture by moving or deleting something that it needs. If, for some reason, Aperture ceases to exist or you recover your Library from a backup 20 years from now you will be able to retrieve all of your masters from inside this folder. In fact, you will even be able to recover all of your custom metadata from the various XML files stored with your master images. 

You are certainly still free to have Aperture store your masters &#039;in the open&#039; on your hard drive using your own custom filing method. 

The big benefits to using the Library are that the masters get backed up if you use Vaults and the master images are kept safe from accidental deletion or modification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you choose to save your Aperture photos in the Aperture Library then they are kept safe for you inside of a special kind of folder that looks in the Finder like a single file. That keeps you from accidentally causing problems for Aperture by moving or deleting something that it needs. If, for some reason, Aperture ceases to exist or you recover your Library from a backup 20 years from now you will be able to retrieve all of your masters from inside this folder. In fact, you will even be able to recover all of your custom metadata from the various XML files stored with your master images. </p>
<p>You are certainly still free to have Aperture store your masters &#8216;in the open&#8217; on your hard drive using your own custom filing method. </p>
<p>The big benefits to using the Library are that the masters get backed up if you use Vaults and the master images are kept safe from accidental deletion or modification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I also found your site today.  I&#039;ve opened Aperture for the first time, I&#039;m use to saving all my photos to a hard drive in folders by year and then topic.  When importing to Aperture are all the photos saved in a single file?  If so what happens 20 years from now when that files is no longer recognized by a program?  Or, can I save the photos to my folder setup I&#039;ve used forever and have Aperture point to them?

This may be a little off topic, sorry.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I also found your site today.  I&#8217;ve opened Aperture for the first time, I&#8217;m use to saving all my photos to a hard drive in folders by year and then topic.  When importing to Aperture are all the photos saved in a single file?  If so what happens 20 years from now when that files is no longer recognized by a program?  Or, can I save the photos to my folder setup I&#8217;ve used forever and have Aperture point to them?</p>
<p>This may be a little off topic, sorry.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vengo</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>vengo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-616</guid>
		<description>this little tip of using &quot;project name&quot; as folder name is great. i was not thinking about it.

and i can make it even faster by pressing cmd-shift-/ and type &quot;relo...&quot;.

so all good for now. on this front at least.

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this little tip of using &#8220;project name&#8221; as folder name is great. i was not thinking about it.</p>
<p>and i can make it even faster by pressing cmd-shift-/ and type &#8220;relo&#8230;&#8221;.</p>
<p>so all good for now. on this front at least.</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-615</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that you&#039;ve found the site useful! 

There is no automated way to move image files. The Relocate Master command under the File menu allows for very flexible filing methods, but you can&#039;t get to it via AppleScript. 

You can set up a custom Subfolder Format when you have the Relocate Master window open. This can contain variables such as image year, image month, and Project. If you always file your images the same way, you can just select everything and choose Relocate Master, choose your Subfolder Format and Aperture will file things for you. 

It isn&#039;t automated, but it isn&#039;t too inconvenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that you&#8217;ve found the site useful! </p>
<p>There is no automated way to move image files. The Relocate Master command under the File menu allows for very flexible filing methods, but you can&#8217;t get to it via AppleScript. </p>
<p>You can set up a custom Subfolder Format when you have the Relocate Master window open. This can contain variables such as image year, image month, and Project. If you always file your images the same way, you can just select everything and choose Relocate Master, choose your Subfolder Format and Aperture will file things for you. </p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t automated, but it isn&#8217;t too inconvenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vengo</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>vengo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-614</guid>
		<description>How about ask you for free discourse once again!

1. I stumbled upon your website today. Found it quite useful. Still have to get my arms around your keywords scripts.

2. Meanwhile a question - i currently import images into a &quot;@process&quot; project. Then I tag, rate and move images or delete. Say I move the images into a project say YYYY-MM-project1, ad that project is contained in folder YYYY. Upon moving the image into that new project, I would ideally like to move the image into the folder Pictures&gt;YYYY&gt;YYYY-MM-project1. If the folder is there, just move the image. If the folder does not exist, then the folder should be created. Any ideas if such a script exists or pointers? The reason I want to do this, is that way even the images on my hard disk are aligned in a systematic manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about ask you for free discourse once again!</p>
<p>1. I stumbled upon your website today. Found it quite useful. Still have to get my arms around your keywords scripts.</p>
<p>2. Meanwhile a question &#8211; i currently import images into a &#8220;@process&#8221; project. Then I tag, rate and move images or delete. Say I move the images into a project say YYYY-MM-project1, ad that project is contained in folder YYYY. Upon moving the image into that new project, I would ideally like to move the image into the folder Pictures&gt;YYYY&gt;YYYY-MM-project1. If the folder is there, just move the image. If the folder does not exist, then the folder should be created. Any ideas if such a script exists or pointers? The reason I want to do this, is that way even the images on my hard disk are aligned in a systematic manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-516</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be happy to discuss organizational options with you.

Aperture&#039;s organizational features can be a bit to wrap your mind around at first. This is the one aspect that seems to cause the most difficulties to the most people.

Folders don&#039;t hold photos they hold Projects, Albums, and other Folders.

Projects are where photos actually reside.

Albums essentially contain references to photos that can be from any Project.

If you place multiple Projects into a Folder, you can see every photo in every Project by selecting the Folder. This is a powerful feature as it allows you to do some arbitrary organization but still have multiple source Projects available together.

So... when you do an import, you import your photos into a Project. If you want your photos to be in a different Project you can move them to another Project. If you put them into an Album, you aren&#039;t actually moving them at all, you are just putting a reference to them into the Album.

What I would recommend is using Smart Albums. You can import your images into a Project of your choice (I use one per month) and automatically have the photos be filed into your Smart Albums simply by adding useful metadata to them.

Lets say that you have several cats, several family members, and take photos of different kinds of plants. You can set up your Keyword hierarchy to look like this:

Plants
	Poison Ivy
	Skunk Cabbage
	Dandelions
Cats
	Fluffy
	Mittens
Family
	Me
	Mom
	Dad
	Cousin Sue

If you set your Smart Album&#039;s criteria to be &#039;Keywords contains Cats&#039; then any image you tag with Fluffy will appear because it automatically inherits the Cat Keyword.

As long as you keyword your images they&#039;ll stay organized for you.

Let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be happy to discuss organizational options with you.</p>
<p>Aperture&#8217;s organizational features can be a bit to wrap your mind around at first. This is the one aspect that seems to cause the most difficulties to the most people.</p>
<p>Folders don&#8217;t hold photos they hold Projects, Albums, and other Folders.</p>
<p>Projects are where photos actually reside.</p>
<p>Albums essentially contain references to photos that can be from any Project.</p>
<p>If you place multiple Projects into a Folder, you can see every photo in every Project by selecting the Folder. This is a powerful feature as it allows you to do some arbitrary organization but still have multiple source Projects available together.</p>
<p>So&#8230; when you do an import, you import your photos into a Project. If you want your photos to be in a different Project you can move them to another Project. If you put them into an Album, you aren&#8217;t actually moving them at all, you are just putting a reference to them into the Album.</p>
<p>What I would recommend is using Smart Albums. You can import your images into a Project of your choice (I use one per month) and automatically have the photos be filed into your Smart Albums simply by adding useful metadata to them.</p>
<p>Lets say that you have several cats, several family members, and take photos of different kinds of plants. You can set up your Keyword hierarchy to look like this:</p>
<p>Plants<br />
	Poison Ivy<br />
	Skunk Cabbage<br />
	Dandelions<br />
Cats<br />
	Fluffy<br />
	Mittens<br />
Family<br />
	Me<br />
	Mom<br />
	Dad<br />
	Cousin Sue</p>
<p>If you set your Smart Album&#8217;s criteria to be &#8216;Keywords contains Cats&#8217; then any image you tag with Fluffy will appear because it automatically inherits the Cat Keyword.</p>
<p>As long as you keyword your images they&#8217;ll stay organized for you.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Purrington</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Purrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-515</guid>
		<description>Brett,

I&#039;m looking forward to using that Applescript for monitoring project sizes -- great advice on backup strategies with projects.

I&#039;m wondering whether you could spare a bit more advice on how to organize.  I know do it by year, but I&#039;m struggling with how to manage workflow (playflow, I guess, since I don&#039;t make any money).  When I import card contents I might have 20 family photos, 5 cat photos, and 30 work-related (plant) photogs -- and I would like to file them in different spots.  I don&#039;t really understand how to do this efficiently.  Part of my frustration is that I can&#039;t simply drag imported images into one of 3 or more folders from the initial &quot;Import Folder&quot;.  I can do it, but the originals are still in the Import Folder&#039;s Project.  I wish that Aperture would migrate the image&#039;s project location automatically.

Am I missing something basic?  Thanks for any advice, if you have a moment someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to using that Applescript for monitoring project sizes &#8212; great advice on backup strategies with projects.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering whether you could spare a bit more advice on how to organize.  I know do it by year, but I&#8217;m struggling with how to manage workflow (playflow, I guess, since I don&#8217;t make any money).  When I import card contents I might have 20 family photos, 5 cat photos, and 30 work-related (plant) photogs &#8212; and I would like to file them in different spots.  I don&#8217;t really understand how to do this efficiently.  Part of my frustration is that I can&#8217;t simply drag imported images into one of 3 or more folders from the initial &#8220;Import Folder&#8221;.  I can do it, but the originals are still in the Import Folder&#8217;s Project.  I wish that Aperture would migrate the image&#8217;s project location automatically.</p>
<p>Am I missing something basic?  Thanks for any advice, if you have a moment someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Gross Photography &#187; Snapshotting Aperture</title>
		<link>http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Gross Photography &#187; Snapshotting Aperture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brettgrossphotography.com/2007/12/22/getting-started-with-aperture-organizing-part-1/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Project-based workflow is great. I like to keep my Projects (including masters managed or referenced) scaled to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Project-based workflow is great. I like to keep my Projects (including masters managed or referenced) scaled to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

